There are the following errors on this form:

    Thank You for submitting your report, Click here to return

    Fixture Details

     
    Processing update .... please wait

    Last report from email(s) :


    Fair Play Marks


    5 - Exceeds the expected standard

    Several examples of excellent behaviour and conduct. Genuine warmth and congratulations towards opponents such as applauding centuries etc. Helping umpires with tight boundary calls in favour of opponents, withdrawal of an appeal to help meet Spirit of the game. Absolutely no need for umpire intervention of any kind by way of player or team conduct nor any dissent at any decision made. Total co-operation with the umpires.

    4- Meets the expected standard

    Few or no comments about an opponent’s ability that could be described as sledging or a persistent attempt to unsettle him or her. Umpire decisions accepted without any dissent (does not include a polite request for clarification). Little or no significant intervention required in player or team conduct situations. Any issue is immediately sorted out by the captain to the umpire’s satisfaction with full co-operation. No Level 1 or Level 2 offences reported under Law 42.

    3- Short of the expected standard

    Several instances of verbal comments about opponents designed to unsettle that may also be considered as persistent and bordering on personal abuse. Outgoing batters subjected to a “send off.” Continued appealing after a decision has been made and/or audible comments made to the umpire that amount to dissent. Team members or their captain are slow to respond to the umpire’s request that conduct is improved. Umpire(s) need to ask the captain to intervene in poor conduct on more than one occasion. Level 1 and Level 2 sanctions under Law 42 may have been applied and reported.

    2- Well short of the expected standard

    very evident lack of respect for opponents with persistent sledging that tends towards personal abuse. Dissent against an umpire decision on more than one occasion. Captain reluctant or unable to exert any control over his/her team’s conduct. Several occasions when umpires have to intervene regarding player conduct. Level 1 and Level 2 sanctions under Law 42 have to be applied. Players subject to formal reporting. Poor or limited co-operation with the umpires to try and improve conduct.

    1 -Significantly short of the expected standard

    Comments made to opponents are often personally abusive. Aggressive appealing that also continues after a decision has been made. Major and persistent dissent at decisions. A very evident lack of cooperation from the captain and his/her team to comply with any umpire requests. Intimidatory behaviour towards opponents or umpires or scorers. Level 3 or Level 4 sanctions applied under Law 42 and/ or more than two instances of Level 2 sanctions. Several players subject to formal reporting from the same team. Multiple instances of the captain being asked to control his/her team’s conduct with no or limited success.


    Disciplinary Issues




    Completing the below with result in a formal warning to the player and on a second such warning a suspension by the league. If you intend to report a more serious offence then select 'Any Level 1 Reports'

    Completing the below with result in an immediate suspension for the player reported. If you intend to report a less serious offence being a warning only select 'Any Formal Warning'


    Please submit a full report on the level 2,3,4 offence or offences to the general manager by email. Please supply the names of the reported individuals , the offence(s) committed including what was said and timings of event. We will then contact you within 48 hours to discuss the details


    Further Information

    Home Team



    Away Team



    Ground Marks



    Criteria
    • These criteria are to be used for marking pitches for all League Games. Always take into consideration the quality and ability of the bowlers, newness of the ball, and prevailing atmospheric conditions that may influence the amount of movement. Pitches cannot be marked for excessive Bounce, Seam or carry based on the performance of a single bowler, whose ability extracts any of the responses from the pitch.
    • Any variation in performance should be as a result of the quality of the pitch only.
    Unevenness of bounce
    1. No unevenness of bounce at any stage throughout the match
    2. Infrequent unevenness of bounce throughout the match
    3. At most, occasional unevenness of bounce at any stage throughout the match
    4. At most, more than occasional unevenness of bounce at any stage throughout the match
    5. Excessive unevenness of bounce for any bowler at any stage throughout the match
    Seam Movement
    1. Limited seam movement at all stages of the match making a good contest of bat vs ball
    2. Limited or no seam movement at all stages of the match
    3. At most, occasional seam movement at all stage of the match
    4. At most, more than occasional seam movement at all stage of the match
    5. Excessive seam movement at all stage of the match
    Carry and/or Bounce
    1. Good carry and/or bounce throughout the match
    2. Average carry and/or bounce throughout the match
    3. Lacking in carry and/or bounce throughout the match
    4. Minimal carry and/or bounce throughout the match
    5. Very minimal carry and/or bounce throughout the match
    Turn
    1. A little turn from the protected area making a good contest of bat vs ball
    2. Limited or no turn from the protected area
    3. Moderate turn from the protected area
    4. More than considerable turn from the protected area
    5. Excessive assistance to spin bowlers from the protected area